References
Alterman, R. (2007). Representation, interaction, and intersubjectivity. Cogn Sci, 31(5), 815-841. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210701530763
Beck, S. W. (2006). Subjectivity and intersubjectivity in the teaching and learning of writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(4), 413-460.
Belcher, A., Hall, B. M., Kelley, K., & Pressey, K. (2015). An analysis of faculty promotion of critical thinking and peer interaction within threaded discussions. Online Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.544
Belt, E. S., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2023). Synchronous video-based communication and online learning: An exploration of instructors’ perceptions and experiences. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 4941-4964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11360-6
Bernstein, A. G., & Isaac, C. (2018). Critical thinking criteria for evaluating online discussion. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), Article 11. "Critical Thinking in Online Discussion" by Arla G. Bernstein and Carol Isaac
Biesta, G. J. J. (1994). Education as a practical intersubjectivity: Towards a critical-pragmatic understanding of education. Educational Theory, 44(3), 299-317.
Bober, M. J., & Dennen, V. P. (2001). Intersubjectivity: Facilitating knowledge construction in online environments. Educational Media International, 38(4), 241-250.
Bradley, M. E., Thom, L. R., Hayes, J., & Hay, C. (2008). Ask and you will receive: how question type influences quantity and quality of online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 888-900. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00804.x
Cooper, K. M., Haney, B., Krieg, A., & Brownell, S. E. (2017). What’s in a name? The importance of students perceiving that an instructor knows their names in a high-enrollment biology classroom. CBE Life Science Education, 16(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-08-0265
Dalsgaard, C., & Paulsen, M. F. (2009). Transparency in cooperative online education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.671
Dennen, V., Choi, H., He, D., & Arslan, Ö. (2024). Course design, belonging, and learner engagement: Meeting the needs of diverse international students in online courses. TechTrends. Course Design, Belonging, and Learner Engagement: Meeting the Needs of Diverse International Students in Online Courses | TechTrends | Springer Nature Link
Dennen, V. P. (2005). From message posting to learning dialogues: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. Distance Education, 26(1), 127-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081376
Dennen, V. P. (2006). Shaping learners’ online dialogues: The role of discourse models. Technology, Instruction, Cognition & Learning, 3, 249-264.
Dennen, V. P. (2007). Presence and positioning as components of online instructor persona. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), 95-108.
Dennen, V. P. (2008). Looking for evidence of learning: Assessment and analysis methods for online discourse. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 205-219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.010
Dennen, V. P., & Bong, J. (2018). Cross-cultural dialogues in an open online course: Navigating national and organizational cultural differences. TechTrends, 62, 383-392. Cross-cultural Dialogues in an Open Online Course: Navigating National and Organizational Cultural Differences | TechTrends | Springer Nature Link
Dennen, V. P. (2019). Frameworks for designing and analyzing learning: Activity interactions in online courses. In M. G. Moore & W. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 244-259). Routledge.
Dennen, V. P., Hall, B. M., & Hedquist, A. (2023). A systematic review of research on intersubjectivity in online learning: Illuminating opportunities for cohesion and mutual understanding in the research conversation. Online Learning, 27(1), 158-186 https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3430
Dennen, V. P., & Hoadley, C. (2013). The design of collaborative learning through computer support. In C. Chan & C. Hmelo-Silver (Eds.), The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning (pp. 389-402). Taylor and Francis.
Dennen, V. P., & Jones, G. (2006). How’s my writing? Using online peer feedback to improve performance in the composition classroom. In Tim S. Roberts (Ed.), Self, Peer and Group Assessment in E-learning (pp. 245-258). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Dennen, V. P., & Wieland, K. (2007). From interaction to intersubjectivity: Facilitating online group discourse processes. Distance Education, 28(3), 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910701611328
Dennen, V. P., & Wieland, K. (2008). Does task type impact participation? Interaction levels and learner orientation in online discussion activities. Technology, Instruction, Cognition & Learning, 6(2), 105-124.
Guerrero-Roldán, A.-E., & Noguera, I. (2018). A model for aligning assessment with competences and learning activities in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 38, 36-46. Redirecting
Gunawardena, C. N., Anderson, T., & Lowe, C. A. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining the social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 395–429.
Hall, B. M. (2014). Designing collaborative activities to promote understanding and problem solving. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 10(2), 55-71.
Hall, B. M. (2015). Intersubjectivity and educational technology. In J. M. Spector, T. Johnson, D. Ifenthaler, W. Savenye, & M. Wang (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Educational Technology (pp. 425-427). SAGE.
Hall, B. M., & Gurjar, N. (2023). Toward culturally inclusive dialogue in online learning. In B. Hokanson, M. Exter, M. Schmidt, & A. Tawfik (Eds.). Toward inclusive learning design: Social justice, equity, and community. Springer-Verlag. Towards Culturally Inclusive Dialogue in Online Learning | Springer Nature Link
Kendall, L. (2009). A response to Christine Hine. In A. M. Markham & N. K. Baym (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (pp. 21-25). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329086
Kirschner, J. (2021). Transparency in online pedagogy: A critical analysis of changing modalities. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 76(4), 439-447.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335-353.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & van Buuren, H. (2007). Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 49(2), 176-192. Redirecting
Lim, J., & Hall, B. M. (2015). Intersubjectivity in theoretical and practical online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(4), 45-60.
Lim, J., Hall, B. M., Jeong, A., & Freed, S. (2017). Intersubjectivity and discussion characteristics in online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 18(1), 29-44.
Lowenthal, P. R., & Dennen, V. P. (2017). Social presence, identity, and online learning: Research development and needs. Distance Education, 38(2), 137-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1335172
Matusov, E. (1996). Intersubjectivity without agreement. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(1), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0301_4
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22-38). Routledge.
Moore, M. G. (2019). The theory of transactional distance. In M. G. Moore & W. C. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (4th ed., pp. 32-46). Routledge.
Oztok, M., Wilton, L., Lee, K., Zingaro, D., Mackinnon, K., Makos, A., Phirangee, K., Brett, C., & Hewitt, J. (2014). Polysynchronous: Dialogic construction of time in online learning. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(2), 154-161.
Peng, S., Komatsuzaki, S., & Sen, R. (2025). Temporal equal and active participation in synchronous collaborative learning: Antecedents and effect for learning. PLOS ONE, 20(3), e0318122. Temporal equal and active participation in synchronous collaborative learning: Antecedents and effect for learning
Phirangee, K., & Malec, A. (2017). Othering in online learning: an examination of social presence, identity, and sense of community. 38, 160-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1322457
Rourke, L., Anderson, T. Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous, text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 51-70.
Rovai, A. P. (2000). Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks. Internet and Higher Education, 3, 285-297.
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319-332. Redirecting
Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. Kogan Page.
Saqr, M., & López-Pernas, S. (2023). The temporal dynamics of online problem-based learning: Why and when sequence matters. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(1), 11-37. The temporal dynamics of online problem-based learning: Why and when sequence matters | International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning | Springer Nature Link
Wang, C. H. (2005). Questioning skills facilitate online synchronous discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 303-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00138.x
Yalçın, Y., & Dennen, V. P. (2023). An investigation of the factors that influence online learners’ satisfaction with the learning experience. Education and Information Technologies. An investigation of the factors that influence online learners’ satisfaction with the learning experience | Education and Information Technologies | Springer Nature Link
York, C. S., & Richardson, J. C. (2012). Interpersonal interactions in online learning: Experienced online instructors’ perceptions of influencing factors.